Useful information

It turned out that they are not the ones the government hopes will be born

It turned out that they are not the ones the government hopes will be born



We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

For years, fertility rates have not shifted, and women of childbearing age are shrinking dramatically and are drastically diminished, according to the latest CSO publications.

The number of women of childbearing age has fallen, but the decline in poverty has not stoppedAt the same time as the national consultation was launched, a new issue of the Demographic Portfolio (2018), the National Institute for Nursing Studies, was presented on Monday. From the data in the book, it turns out to be a little bit Below 1.5 fertility rate, which for years hasn't moved. That's lower than what the government wants. However, the mood for childhood has grown under a few years, but this may not be close to government action - the Index tells you. the number of births stagnated since 2014. 91,577 children were born last year, and it seems that this figure does not go back to 100,000 (between 95,000 and 100,000 new births a year between 2000 and 2009). The overall fertility rate (the number of children that would be born in a woman's life if the data for that year would go down) jumped from 1.24 in 2011 to 1.49 in 2016. The fertility rate should be over 2 in order for the population to reproduce itself, this is what the government wants, and therefore the family has a significant role in giving money in the form of we are reporting 4.6 percent, which is an internationally outstanding value. However, it is not clear at all that governmental family policies are at the root of productivity growth. On three fronts, it may not be the case that well-targeted family policies are not conducive to productivity growth.International trends seem to suggest that, although in the past, visszapуtlуdбsnak said process: the decline in productivity after the change of regime is shorter, that is, children who are postponed in uncertain times are shorter, but are born. According to this, nothing special happened, we missed our neighbors just in time. to have children who can support them, the overwhelming majority of measures are better suited to those living in better conditions. If we look at the geographical distribution, productivity has increased the most in the poorest regions. From the data of the HCSO, it is also good to see that the two-child model is beginning to wear out: more and more childless, From 78 per cent to 67, the proportion of those who expect a second after their first child grew from 25 to 27 per cent who also had a third.
  • The mother of three would not pay taxes
  • Fewer children are being born
  • Fewer have more children