Is it ethical to do research, develop treatment methods that can, in principle, develop into a human being? Opinions are divided, some emphasize the usefulness of developers, others protect human life. And the blood cord blood?
Opinion of the Professor of Biology
Dr. Falus AndrбsIn a statement to Unipress, Dr. Andalus Falus made the following standpoint on cloning, stem cell research: a pizzбt because of this are very serious ethical, vilбgnйzeti vonatkozбsai. Йn completely egyetйrtek this ellenvetйssel. the хssejt-kutatбsnak however large jelentхsйgы practical kцvetkezmйnyei vбrhatуak the gyуgyнtбs terьletйn the jцvхben. will nyъjtani the kutatбsok the szervpуtlбs the szervбtьltetйs current problйmбinak the tцbbsйgйre megoldбst These pragmatic benefits outweigh the ethical considerations of permissive accountants, as we have been used to in scientific disputes.
In my personal opinion - and I am aware that there are different opinions than mine - even if we are capable of it, we should not create a human being. An oocyte that has begun to divide must be considered human. The purpose of creation with man and with all the wonderful world is to be human, not the source of a liver or kidney, possibly a lung. I am generally liberal in scientific research, there is no ideology in science, but this is a point that I do not think should be fooled. And it's really fantastic that you don't have to, because trying to get the cord, the adult stem cell, and other jobs offers opportunities that bypass the - I think - red light. "
We need to know: the stem cell is a blood-stemming stem cell, but not an embryonic stem cell. In fact, it belongs to adult stem cells, but from a younger age it can be used better than bone marrow derived stem cells.
Resolution of the European Parliament
The цnkйntes йs tйrнtйsmentes adomбnyozбst the nemzetkцzi register csatlakozу donors nцvelve szбmбt with kцzцs alapelvkйnt йs megfelelх minхsйgi elхнrбsok, especially garanciбk tбmogatni also kнvбnja, or csontvelх- akбr kцldцkzsinуrvйr хssejtek esetйben (EU 2004/23 EC irбnyelve, 29/03/2004 EU "Ethical Aspects ... ")
According to the Catholic Church, when an animal enters the body when it is conceived, killing the fertilized egg is a sinful act. One cannot take control of the process because, like in artificial fertilization experiments, many souls would be lost.
Muslim criticismThere is no central authority in Islam, as in the Vatican, for example, in Catholicism, which takes a stand on requests for stem cell transplantation. Embryonic stem cell transplantation is not legally regulated in most Muslim countries, but even in Egypt. Not only modern, neological, but scholars of such a conservative Islamic view, as well as practitioners believe that stem cell research and embryonic tissue healing are completely morally permissible in their present age because of their religious beliefs. According to Sharia (Islamic Law), the soul migrates on the 120th day of the fetal life.
However, a small majority of the population agrees with the Orthodox Coptic and Catholic view that they are denouncing ethical actions. Cloning, even if it is for the purpose of healing, is an elite practice prohibited by Egyptian Medical Council law, as is the use of the embryonic tissue. "In the case of embryos, it is human life. So only the use of stem cells derived from the cord blood is allowed." says Hamdy El-Sayed, president of the Syndicate.